5
points maximum rating
December
2014
7. Observations, critics and suggestions
MY CONGRATULATIONS FOR THE COORDINATION AND WE EXPECT TO CONTINUE
RECEIVING COURSES IN THIS WAY
Excellent experience.
Do not limit so much the number of participants per Credit Union, in the
possible try to respect the timings.
To be the first time that we do this type of virtual training, the
expectations were very well fulfilled, let us go ahead with these trainings.
Excellent training, success.
Thank you for the invitations, it was a different experience and and I
believe that we can have access to highly experience professionals and the
distance will not be a limitation.
No comment, everything was well.
An excellent method for teaching.
Is convenient to mention that the course was very interesting and highly
productive. But next time the Internet access should be better (It should be
perfected). also we demand that this type of culture be promoted in the
personnel training with highly relevant issues and of interest to the
requirements of our Credit Unions. Thanks for being invited.
CONGRATULATIONS FOR THE CONTAINS, WE WILL ALSO LIKE TO BE SUPPORTED WITH
LENDING ISSUES.
It was a very productive course...
That the support materials of each day be made available the same day at
the end of the course, to reinforce the newly acquired knowledge of the
imparted issues (This has been changed in all the courses and not at the end as
this was the case)
EXCELENT FORMATION. I LIKED THE NEW WAY IN WHICH IT WAS PRESENTED; THE
EVALUATIONS WERE OF CRITERIA; SO THAT THERE WAS THE OPORTUNITY FOR
INTERPRETATION.
Before starting a new course the IT people in the Credit Unions should
do testing with Internet access, in order not to have to do it during the
course.
This methodology was on target, 100 points.
Verify previously the accesses to Internet through the network to
achieve a better communication.
8. Course description and results
The course was
given during 5 working days, with 2 teaching sessions of 90 minutes each and 10
minutes after each session for questions and a 10 minutes recess between each
lesson each day each day. For a total of 2 an a half hours each day (A total
of 17,5 hours), After each teaching
day, a 20 multiple choice questions to choose one evaluation was filled and
rendered by the assistants (It added a total of 100 evaluative questions.(5
days x 20 questions each day) and at the end of the course two options of Workshops were offered for the assistants
to choose one from the two. A week was given to dend the workshop solve.
Both the evaluations and the workshops
punctuations had to be high enough in order to receive the diploma.The
knowledge gained was started to be
applied in the institutions practically from the nex week after finishing the
workshops. The average note of in the daily evaluations was 90 over 100 of
correct for the 52 participants and in the workshops the group averages a note
of 93 points over 100.
OBSERVATION:
The evaluations were done by the Institution who contracted the courses and
were controlled directly by them and in this process the professor had no
participation, he only received these results.
jlinaresf@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment